re: Finishing out A&M's football wiki pages

Posted on 1/12/14 at 2:04 pm to Dr RC

Posted by Agforlife

Somewhere in the Brazos Valley

Member since Nov 2012

20102 posts

Posted on 1/12/14 at 2:04 pm to Dr RC

Link him to similar pages is all I can think to do

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Dr RC

The Money Pit

Member since Aug 2011

58144 posts

Posted on 1/12/14 at 2:21 pm to Agforlife

I just did that in another response.

quote:

How is the 87 A&M football season not notable enough?

There are literally hundreds of individual season pages for various college football teams on Wiki. There are many about Texas A&M as well. You can see complete season pages for the years 1988-2014.

quote:
How in the world are the other seasons ok for individual pages when this one is not? Your citation is not consistent with other mods views on Wiki pages such as this at all.

Kentatm (talk) 19:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Your page has been written in advertisement sense. And there are thousands of seasons on each game that doesn't mean all are notable. What you are trying to do is that you are making it as special one. Its not so, as I already told you that if the subject is not notable then Wikipedia doesn't have an article about it. Nechlison (talk) 20:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

my most recent response.

quote:

Again, I ask you, how is this page any different than the many individual season pages already made for various college football teams? Have you even looked at other pages to see how it is exactly the same?

LINK LINK LINK

How is this an advertisement? Are those other pages I listed also advertisements?

What do you even mean by "And there are thousands of seasons on each game"? What? There is only one 1987 college football season.

Also, I find it interesting that you say I am trying to make that specific season special when it in fact is one of the most successful season in A&M history. They won the SWC, won a major bowl (Cotton) against a Notre Dame team that had the Heisman winner, and finished the season ranked in the top 10.

There are many team pages just like the one I have created that were for far less successful years. Again, how do those not violate the rules while this one does? Kentatm (talk) 20:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)