Started By
Message
re: US Army Bowl (updates)
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:50 pm to gatorhata9
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:50 pm to gatorhata9
quote:
I'm sure you are. He's going to be just fine. He's a gunslinger for sure, he just needs polishing. But whatever you need to say to justify missing on Barker.
What does missing on Barker have to do with anything?
USC passed on both Worley and Golson from SC and it turned out to be a good decision. Looks like it was a good decision with Park as well because hes looked like shite in both the Shrine and Army bowl games
2
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:53 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Looks like it was a good decision with Park as well because hes looked like shite in both the Shrine and Army bowl games
Even though he looked good during the actual season and during The Opening? Seems like sound reasoning.
Posted on 1/5/14 at 12:18 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
USC passed on both Worley and Golson from SC and it turned out to be a good decision. Looks like it was a good decision with Park as well because hes looked like shite in both the Shrine and Army bowl games
So he was great during the season. Enough to win Mr. Football but because he didn't play well in 2 all star games where he has no chemistry with anyone and only a week to practice, he sucks. Are you really this dumb?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News