That's really the thing that bothered me about that situation. You know damn good in well that if Alabama came into Tiger Stadium and won in the same fashion as LSU did NOBODY would have even talked about a rematch. As soon as the 11/5/11 game was over everyone in the media was talking "rematch" because for some reason LSU winning in Bama's house didn't prove enough

?

LSU had everything to lose in the title game... If we win it's, "well they already beat them and should've played okie state" and losing meant no crystal

A way to feel good about the 2011 LSU team is reminding yourself that we beat every team we played

This post was edited on 12/30/13 at 12:29 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Zamoro10

Member since Jul 2008

14743 posts

Posted on 12/30/13 at 12:54 am to lwlsu96

quote:
As soon as the 11/5/11 game was over everyone in the media was talking "rematch" because for some reason LSU winning in Bama's house didn't prove enough

I usually don't buy paranoia...but that season justifies it.

Never seen a push like that by the media.

It was as if they couldn't stand that Bama lost the game to LSU.

Bama's name was mentioned every second after...didn't drop but an inch in the polls...and suddenly, it was as if...LSU was lucky to have won the game because Bama missed a few long FGs! Isn't that part of football teams? Special teams?

And I'm no LSU fan...but LSU was the beneficiary of the screwjob in 2003...and then they got the butt-end in 2011.

So what comes around goes around - but LSU in 2011 was screwed no doubt.

When does Bama ever get screwed?

They claim titles to 3 teams they lost to!!!!!!!!!

3 National Titles Alabama claims - and they lost to all 3 "supposedly" runner-ups!

What sister-kin screwing universe does Bama live in?

Even their so-called national titles are incestuous! You lost in season...to the patriarch.

This post was edited on 12/30/13 at 12:56 am

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board