Started By
Message
re: 2004 USC vs 2012 Bama
Posted on 12/26/13 at 4:45 pm to bbeck
Posted on 12/26/13 at 4:45 pm to bbeck
They were not by any means incredibly dominant. We are not discussing who was the most talented group. None of those future NFL players on that Miami team were pro bowlers already In 2001. Ill take off the crimson glasses if you explain how 01 Miami was on another level not counting talent. 95 Nebraska was more dominant with less talent.
So 2001 Nebraska is better than 2012 notre dame even though they got pummeled 63-32 by a 10-3 Colorado team? Just because Notre Dame got thumped by a good Bama team DOES NOT mean Notre Dame just flat out sucked
So 2001 Nebraska is better than 2012 notre dame even though they got pummeled 63-32 by a 10-3 Colorado team? Just because Notre Dame got thumped by a good Bama team DOES NOT mean Notre Dame just flat out sucked
1
Posted on 12/26/13 at 4:56 pm to The Silverback
quote:
Just because Notre Dame got thumped by a good Bama team DOES NOT mean Notre Dame just flat out sucked
Pitt and Stanford should have beat them. You saw them play. What else can I say? They weren't that good.
Now, I apologize for the hijack
I just feel like the large majority of posters, even non-Bama fans, will tend to agree that 01 Miami is possibly the most talented team to come through college football in many years. And more often than not, the talent will win out on the field. Just my opinion.
This post was edited on 12/26/13 at 4:58 pm
Page 1 of 1
Latest Alabama News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News