Started By
Message
re: Poor Wisconsin
Posted on 12/8/13 at 7:46 am to Woopigsooie20
Posted on 12/8/13 at 7:46 am to Woopigsooie20
?
They were terrible last year, returning starters is pretty meaningless.
Not a big football guy?
They were terrible last year, returning starters is pretty meaningless.
Not a big football guy?
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:22 am to j1897
They were supposed to be really good this year. Even before Bielema left he was saying this would be the best team he had ever had at Wisconsin. They definitely had a disappointing year from what they were expecting.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 9:23 am to j1897
I think "terrible" is a pretty strong word for what they were last year. All their losses were really close games and three were OT. It's not like they were getting blown out.
Posted on 12/8/13 at 10:40 am to j1897
quote:
They were supposed to be really good this year. Even before Bielema left he was saying this would be the best team he had ever had at Wisconsin. They definitely had a disappointing year from what they were expecting.
quote:
j1897
quote:
Not a big football guy?
Posted on 12/8/13 at 1:32 pm to j1897
quote:
They were terrible last year, returning starters is pretty meaningless.
Not a big football guy?
Returning starters is meaningless? You're basically saying recruiting/talent doesn't matter.
They returned only 8 starters from the 2011 team and pretty much had an entire new staff.
and no, they weren't terrible. Their biggest margin of defeat was 7 points and they might have been benefit of NCAA sanctions, but they didn't have the Big 10 title handed to them, they won the Championship game.
Not a big football guy?
This post was edited on 12/8/13 at 1:34 pm
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News