Started By
Message
re: OK boys the NEW YORK TIMES has vindicated Ol' Anti.
Posted on 12/5/13 at 6:29 am to S.E.C. Crazy
Posted on 12/5/13 at 6:29 am to S.E.C. Crazy
Your other thread did not go as you planned. I watched the play over and over, but I see no evidence of a blatant hold. We have covered the fact many times that lineman can in fact be three yards downfield. Prosh is 5 yards down field, but he was a eligible receiver. Can not be pass interference, because Mosely was not in position to make a catch.
Like all games there are questionable plays such as the non-call in Bama on an obvious block in the back on Jones PR. It was at the point of attack and That one call could have easily cost Auburn the game. call that penalty and field position is flipped.
Like all games there are questionable plays such as the non-call in Bama on an obvious block in the back on Jones PR. It was at the point of attack and That one call could have easily cost Auburn the game. call that penalty and field position is flipped.
1
Posted on 12/5/13 at 7:25 am to allin2010
You admitted that Prosch was where I said he was...he can't be blocking Mosley while the pass is being thrown.
An Alabama CB could have interfered with an Auburn receiver on the opposite side down the field and the flag would have come out.
IF you watch 73 and you miss that tackle you need a dog and a cane.
An Alabama CB could have interfered with an Auburn receiver on the opposite side down the field and the flag would have come out.
IF you watch 73 and you miss that tackle you need a dog and a cane.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News