Started By
Message

re: tOfficial Meltdown thread

Posted on 12/1/13 at 2:11 pm to
Posted by Section 80
Member since Apr 2013
800 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Ivory wasn't the NG we needed


From what I saw he didn't play NG at all in the game. We played more of a 4-2-5 all game and it seemed like Ivory was useless not playing his normal NG role.
Posted by T Rey WI
Back in the south where I belong!
Member since Dec 2010
2937 posts
Posted on 12/1/13 at 2:57 pm to
We did play alot of 4-2-5. Coach Gus had a great game plan for the 4-2-5 he knew we would play. CJ did not make as many plays as most thought he should but that was the game pln for Gus. They took CJ out of the game by reading him on the read option, whatever he took they went to the other option. When #35 was at FB/HB for Auburn, he was the lead blocker on DePriest or to seal the edge. That put the run support game in the hands of LC coming up from safety. LC tends to try to jump plays for the big hit on the corner rather than leverage inside-out like he is supposed to do. When LC overstepped to the sideline, Auburns QB would turn it up behind the seal on the edge.

TX A&M showed Auburn how to take CJ out of the play by making him the read. VS was not there to fill behind him and Auburn capitalized on the flaw in our defense (the one that shows up when players go for the kill rather than just doing their job. Late in the game the third option came into play when Cyrus at CB left his man to try to make a play that was not his to make. Result, touchdown pass over his head.

The whole game came down to Alabama players trying to do someone elses job rather than theirs or making concentration errors. If they all play assignment defense then Alabama wins by 17 point (maybe more).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter