Started By
Message

re: Saturday: The most highly anticipated Iron Bowl of my lifetime

Posted on 11/29/13 at 9:33 am to
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37677 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 9:33 am to
The Iron Bowl lost a lot it's meaning when they moved it out of Birmingham. It's the city's fault for not getting a stadium deal done so it was probably inevitable. However, AUs' s insistence to moving it to JH was just an attempt to gain an advantage. They didn't want to play Bama on a neutral site. Bama should have had the balls to call their bluff to quit and take their ball and go home. I would have been fine with it they need the game more than we did.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 9:36 am to
quote:

The Iron Bowl lost a lot it's meaning when they moved it out of Birmingham. It's the city's fault for not getting a stadium deal done so it was probably inevitable. However, AUs' s insistence to moving it to JH was just an attempt to gain an advantage. They didn't want to play Bama on a neutral site. Bama should have had the balls to call their bluff to quit and take their ball and go home. I would have been fine with it they need the game more than we did.


Holy frick you're an idiot.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Bama should have had the balls to call their bluff to quit and take their ball and go home. I would have been fine with it they need the game more than we did.



Birmingham forced Bama's hand on that. Legion Field and the surrounding area were really no longer suitable for this game. I would love to see another 50/50 split Iron Bowl again in Bham, just not at Legion Field.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91649 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 9:40 am to
Alright, Harvey.
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 11/29/13 at 9:42 am to
quote:

The Iron Bowl lost a lot it's meaning when they moved it out of Birmingham. It's the city's fault for not getting a stadium deal done so it was probably inevitable. However, AUs' s insistence to moving it to JH was just an attempt to gain an advantage. They didn't want to play Bama on a neutral site. Bama should have had the balls to call their bluff to quit and take their ball and go home. I would have been fine with it they need the game more than we did.


Pat Dye was going to move the IB to Auburn regardless. For a number of reasons. 1. Recruiting. 2. Revenue 3. national prominence.

Same reason we no longer played Georgia in Columbus or Tennessee in Birmingham etc. Bama was the last bastion of resistence.

The fact that Bham couldnt/wouldnt do a stadium deal had as much to do with Bama wanting to play more games in T-Town as the IB. Birmingham has long had incompetent city government. This was a classic example.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter