Started By
Message
re: List of SEC teams that would have played in the 2004 BCSNC
Posted on 11/15/13 at 8:19 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
Posted on 11/15/13 at 8:19 am to BAMAisDIESEL09
You're probably too young to remember, or just trolling, but I'll correct you anyways. The national perception of the SEC wasn't as strong in the early 2000's because USC was the media powerhouse. Therefore the current arguement that "Any undefeated SEC team should play for the NC" wasn't prevalent back then. So when the AP and USA Today and BCS #1 and #2 remain undefeated all year (USC and OK), no one jumps them.
This post was edited on 11/15/13 at 8:20 am
1
Posted on 11/15/13 at 8:46 am to Flat Stick
quote:
The national perception of the SEC wasn't as strong in the early 2000's
Thanks, Auburn
quote:
...because USC (went guts deep on auburn) was the media powerhouse.
quote:
So when the AP and USA Today and BCS #1 and #2 remain undefeated and way better than Auburn all year (USC and OK), no one jumps them.
e.t.a. to add for truthfullness
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News