Started By
Message

re: Solutions

Posted on 11/6/13 at 11:50 am to
Posted by reel_gator8
Seminole,Fl
Member since May 2012
11060 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 11:50 am to
Cornhat ...you completely ignore the basic explanations of my post as it doesn't fit too well in your theory...but that's ok...these are opinions afterall.

After I explained my reasoning of our offensive shortcomings and successes....you don't give us reason to qualify Peases failures....but we are a school with top resources and money should be able to get us a better offense. Sure sure.
Last year we moved the ball on UGA but turnovers killed us....it wasn't the play calling...its execution. Re read my post again before wading into the "he's not developing" pool. Driskel was splitting reps all the way til start of the season..and in essense he was r/s frosh with VERY limited snaps under his belt.
Our defense was stout and there was no reason to throw much...why entertain fans? Boom wants to win and we were a field position, eat clock and run the ball down their throat team. Everyone was pretty happy after LSU game...we went 11-1 and didn't show up for Sugar Bowl.

We start out this year with the canes and Driskel throws for almost 300 yds...but five turnovers sink us. After Driskel went out...nothing can be determined in honesty about how well we would have played on offense and the injuries mounted.

I don't personally care if Pease stays or not...I do know we recruited well on the offensive side this past Feb and have a top QB ready to come to Gainesville....I will let Muschamp decide what is best...he knows his future depends on this and if we fail in 2014...he is gone. Remember that a new OC can create confusion with his own set of play calls and making everyone learn a new system, do we want that? Boom only has a year and a lot of OCs aren't going want to come to UF with the fear that the house gets cleaned if Boom is let go.
Posted by cornhat
Member since Feb 2011
3393 posts
Posted on 11/8/13 at 6:18 pm to
Sorry for the delay.

Does anyone believe that there was a real QB competition heading into last year? I thought that was debunked early on. While our team was winning, it was clear the offense was poor. That 11-1 record wasn't because of the offense. And that was not a painless 11-1 record either. Improvement should've been a goal on the offensive side. A better offense would've made the ULL and Missou game MUCH easier.

And while that LSU game turned out in a win, the offense wasn't good in that game either. The Sugar Bowl was bad, but I'll attribute that to being in a let down bowl even though they ended the season on a high note with a win against FSU.

Red zone offense is horrific and I'm blaming Pease partially for stalling momentum with awful plays for Burton. How he can't evaluate the effectiveness (or lack of) for that play is mindboggling.

The lack of O-line recruiting is something the coaches brought on themselves. This season is a wash but there are ways they can work around Murphy's skills. I just don't see quality offensive coaching from Pease.

I'm not much for blaming Boom, only because he can coach defense and without injuries, they are elite. But he's responsible for this ship. I don't think this is scapegoating Pease. He's not showing anything worthwhile. And while we can attribute the poor offense on coaching or execution by players, I believe that coaching explains the herp-derping of our players regularly in games.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter