Started By
Message

re: First Battle of Civil War was Battle of Blackjack b/t Missouri & Kansas Forces

Posted on 10/25/13 at 2:31 pm to
Posted by HarryBalzack
Member since Oct 2012
15229 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 2:31 pm to
Or we could deconstruct Bacon's Rebellion, Lord Dunmore's Proclamation, the NW Ordinance, the Great Compromise, yada, yada, yada - none which have a damn thing to do with Missouri, and even if they did, who the hell thinks it's cool to have started a civil war?
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37971 posts
Posted on 10/25/13 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

.... who the hell thinks it's cool to have started a civil war?


You do know and comprehend the difference between the who and the what and the where, do you not?

The causality, the causation ... the relation to the actual event and the effect, do you not?

Civil Wars rarely begin when the first shots are fired or the first blood is drawn ... they begin long before.

Civil Wars are often necessary ... it sometimes takes a mess to fix a mess, one way or the other.

Yeah, we're proud to claim the first shots here in SC. We may actually fire the first shots of the second one as well.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter