Started By
Message
re: Where do you stand on SEC Realignment?
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:28 pm to DamnStrong1860
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:28 pm to DamnStrong1860
I would go back to ten teams, play everyone, and not have a championship game.
3
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:48 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I would go back to ten teams, play everyone, and not have a championship game.
+1 for me. Have a strong SWC, a strong and smaller ACC, about 15 bowl games max (maybe 20), be done with it New Years Day.
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:49 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I would go back to ten teams, play everyone, and not have a championship game.
Arkansas and South Carolina really haven't added a damn thing to SEC football. Both have them combined for zero national championships, zero conference championships and zero major BCS bowl wins after being added to the SEC. They also haven't had many great out-of-conference wins that has helped out the SEC cause either. Out of the four SEC additions since 1992, Texas A&M is the only school out of the bunch with the potential to become a national power. The SEC could have stuck with ten schools and it wouldn't have affected the football one bit. In fact, it probably would have been enhanced with fewer mediocre football schools dragging down the rest of the conference.
This post was edited on 10/19/13 at 12:35 am
Posted on 10/18/13 at 10:58 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I would go back to ten teams, play everyone, and not have a championship game.
What if we kept 14 and did away with the Championship game? That might lead to Co-Champions every year and result in two SEC teams in the playoffs.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News