Started By
Message

re: fumble or not?

Posted on 10/7/13 at 5:58 pm to
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

you can pretty easily surmise where his fingers are


You may be right that he lost possession right there, but that is blurry, and you are speculating about where his fingers might be when you say that you can "surmise." That is not indisputable evidence to overturn the call on the field.
quote:

That picture does not show someone in possession of a football.

Nor does it show someone NOT in possession. It's inconclusive, thus, the ruling on the field stands. Touchdown.

That's all I am arguing. You can't really tell from the video that he loses possession prior to the ball crossing the front of the goal line. When in doubt, the ruling on the field stands.


It amazes me that people are so emphatic about this when I look at that video. There's no way that the replay official had enough to overturn. I just can't imagine that person being so certain.
Posted by Bassmanbruno
Member since Dec 2008
1440 posts
Posted on 10/7/13 at 6:00 pm to
There a third of the upper deck isn't even built in that picture.

I think we can all agree there wasn't indisputable evidence that he fumbled even if he did fumble. Glad we all agree.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter