Started By
Message

re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.

Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:08 pm to
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40951 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:08 pm to
Lol is this thread serious?
Posted by DovaVol
Member since Dec 2008
2198 posts
Posted on 10/2/13 at 11:04 am to
quote:

I've never understood the whole facilities thing. Obviously Faurot needs to have some work and expansion done, that's happening now.

I don't get why the training facilities are the big deal. We just opened our 100,000 square foot training facility in 2008. Are all the comments about Mizzou's facilities being shitty because because the training facility is not football exclusive or am I missing something else?


Until you "get" this, your program will be average at best. Sure you'll have good years, b/c you're going to steal a few players here and there; but overall the program will be average at best. Look at the top ten recruiting classes every year, then google their training facilities. I'd be willing to bet that outside of USCw, every single one of them has top notch 100,000+ sf football facilities. These are part of the things that help get numerous top notch recruits in each class(not just stealing 1 or 2 and pairing them with a bunch of 2-3 stars); and given the correct coaching(something that's been a problem in Knoxville), produce results on the field.

quote:

Lol is this thread serious?


apparently about 7-8 pages(a page or two of it was the auburn guy stirring the pot) of "serious"
This post was edited on 10/2/13 at 11:06 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter