Started By
Message

re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.

Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:18 pm to
Posted by Remote Controlled
Member since Apr 2013
6859 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

Much better OP!!


I didn't change any of that...
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

I didn't change any of that...


I just focused on that and dropped all the rest of it - it is why it was in quotes

If you are recruiting kids they will not care about the dollars the school brings in they just want to play where they get on TV and where they play in "atmospheres" that separate the players from the also rans. Tennessee already has it and Missouri needs to build it.
Posted by SunHog
Illinois
Member since Jan 2011
9202 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:28 pm to
The game has changed.

Tennessee is having a much harder time recruiting Georgia and South Carolina's recruiting grounds with the successes of Clemson, USC and UGA. However, they have their facilities in place.

Missouri needs better facilities, player development and coaching across the board and last but certainly not least, they need to recruit Illinois heavily!

I think Missouri will compete if those steps are accomplished however if they are not they will remain at Kentucky's caliber. I'm giving the edge to Tennessee as they just currently start with more in facilities and tradition.

You gotta have these..

This post was edited on 10/1/13 at 8:30 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111611 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

I didn't change any of that...


That was weird.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter