Started By
Message

re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.

Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:58 pm to
Posted by blacknblu
Member since Nov 2011
10276 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 7:58 pm to
I don't say this to "hate", but Tennessee is Tennessee. The name alone has football undertones. They have National Championships. They are an iconic program.

That being said, they're in debt, and it will probably be a few years before they start getting it back.

I say Mizzou.
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

I don't say this to "hate", but Tennessee is Tennessee. The name alone has football undertones. They have National Championships. They are an iconic program.



That alone will get them recruits. Tennessee is a well respected program to the recruits down south.

quote:


That being said, they're in debt, and it will probably be a few years before they start getting it back.


On that note Mizzou have MONEY rolling in from donations since joining the SEC. Lot more still coming in.lol.

I think a better comparison would be Mizzou vs Ole Miss, Miss St, Arky or some middle pack SEC team. As of right now I still think of Tennessee as top half SEC even if they're down. They'll be back.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter