Started By
Message
re: Why do some people say LSU shouldn't have had Georgia on their schedule?
Posted on 9/29/13 at 1:56 pm to Bama54
Posted on 9/29/13 at 1:56 pm to Bama54
quote:
We played both UF and USCe in2010.
Time for UGA to rotate on and I welcome it.
But like it or not, by rotation, we were due UK.
I think that the "schedule" talk is bullshite, I was just answering the question
YES, the gripes from SC the last 2 years and LSU have SOME merit, but that shite will even itself out eventually
the LSU vs Bama game will determine the West this year, like it does most years...
2
Posted on 9/29/13 at 2:11 pm to dcbl
I think if we were on a regular rotating schedule there wouldn't be as much complaining. In 2011 when UGA had the easier schedule than USC that was just the way it was.
Since then the schedules have been crafted with no transparency and some of teams (UGA and Bama) have benefited tremendously from the schedules that were made.
Since then the schedules have been crafted with no transparency and some of teams (UGA and Bama) have benefited tremendously from the schedules that were made.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 3:08 pm to dcbl
quote:
I think that the "schedule" talk is bullshite, I was just answering the question
YES, the gripes from SC the last 2 years and LSU have SOME merit, but that shite will even itself out eventually
the LSU vs Bama game will determine the West this year, like it does most years...
Exactly. South Carolina fans should just accept that their team wasn't that great in 2011 and 2012. I think what hurts them is the fact that they beat Georgia and lost the division. On the other hand, LSU has finished higher in the SEC West standings when they have beaten Alabama. So the real issue is that LSU lost to Alabama twice last year, which cost them 1 or 2 national championships.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News