Started By
Message

re: Stanford vs the SEC : for all the blowhards saying how good the PAC is.

Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:54 am to
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46645 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 1:54 am to
quote:

Recruiting sites...dafuq? I have seen Stanford players littered all over 2014 big boards though...


If you think Stanford has as much nfl talent on defense as lsu , bama or uf, you're dumb. Period. I'm not saying Stanford isn't talented, because they are. But they don't have a much talent as the top tier sec team( top5-10 recruiting classes every year). Sorry but it's true.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 2:07 am to
Richards and Reynolds are 2nd round prospects at Safety. Carter is a top 3, maybe #1 cb, in 2015 (he is a true sophomore). The other cb is 5 star Lyons. That is just their secondary, which doesn't include Browning and the nicklebacker.

I know LSU's roster. I have watched three full games and one last week in Louisiana with a circle jerk going on and no one noticing the arse raping Stanford was giving ASU.

I also watched Stanford. Their defense is more talented THIS year.

Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 9/28/13 at 3:12 am to
quote:

If you think Stanford has as much nfl talent on defense as lsu , bama or uf, you're dumb. Period. I'm not saying Stanford isn't talented, because they are. But they don't have a much talent as the top tier sec team( top5-10 recruiting classes every year). Sorry but it's true.


I'll make any bet you want Stanford has more individuals off its current defense drafted than LSU does off their current defense.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter