Started By
Message

re: How does the Fluker situation differ from the Langham situation?

Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:24 pm to
Posted by cjared036
Houston, tx
Member since Dec 2009
9569 posts
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:24 pm to
Langham signed his name on a napkin and accepted a steak dinner.


Fluker used a few crooks to go to NoLA.

That is how I see it.
Posted by artompkins
Orange Beach, Al
Member since May 2010
5618 posts
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:27 pm to
Pretty sure Bama admin copped to knowing about his being ineligible in hopes of getting off light.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Langham signed his name on a napkin


Ive always loved the napkin excuse.


There were also other aspects besides Langham in that infraction ruling
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

How does the Fluker situation differ from the Langham situation?


Langham actually signed with an agent and got some benefit, then decided to return to Bama. Coach Stallings didn't like the NCAA investigator and kicked them out of his office. That led to greater problems.

Fluker didn't sign with agent, but apparently took money from runner. This time Bama is investigating and will cooperate in any investigation should one begin.
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 3:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter