Started By
Message

re: How about Brendan "white lightening" Douglas?

Posted on 9/7/13 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by DawgHolliday
the 'cloven-land', ga
Member since Sep 2012
4990 posts
Posted on 9/7/13 at 7:49 pm to
Clowneys name was not called often. Granted we had to gameplan for the guy but, I don't think he was much of a factor today. Im not saying he was gassed or that he isn't a beast, just saying that other than that bonehead single back formation on 3rd and long when he got his sack, and one decent tackle on Gurley...not much he did had any effect on the game.
Posted by Sandwich
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
5549 posts
Posted on 9/7/13 at 7:53 pm to
He did end up hurting Gates, not on purpose, but still. wonder if hes gonna be ok.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58977 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 5:42 am to
quote:

Clowneys name was not called often. Granted we had to gameplan for the guy but, I don't think he was much of a factor today.


I would have to watch the game again, but what did we do differently to Clowney? I really didn't see too much double teaming or anything special. (Granted I wasn't watching Clowney specifically, so it could have been going on)

Gates got beat once badly by Clowney, but what Tackle wouldn't. We may have seen Gates take a HUGE step forward in becoming a decen tackle. I DID see Clowney take himself out of some plays by charging inside and the ball went out. Whatever the cause, it made an impact on the game.

SouCar has three legitimate DLinemen. Quarles and Sutton to go along with Clowney. I didn't see where any of them were a major factor. Their running backs were a nice replacement for Lattimore, though.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter