Started By
Message

re: Lamecox....

Posted on 8/30/13 at 8:18 am to
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60939 posts
Posted on 8/30/13 at 8:18 am to
I'm surprised at how good Mike Davis looked, but I wouldn't trade him for either half of Gurshall to have gotten him. They may have been sandbagging a little, but I didn't see anything from SC to indicate that they're not eminently beatable.

Half of Shaw's yards in the air were from the 3rd play.
Posted by PortlyDawg
GA
Member since Aug 2011
2400 posts
Posted on 8/30/13 at 8:27 am to
quote:

I'm surprised at how good Mike Davis looked, but I wouldn't trade him for either half of Gurshall to have gotten him. They may have been sandbagging a little, but I didn't see anything from SC to indicate that they're not eminently beatable.

Half of Shaw's yards in the air were from the 3rd play.


SC's running game looks legit- passing game too (out of play-action). Shaw is ballsy, but he's gonna get himself killed. And even though they only allowed 10 pts., the D looked vulnerable at times, though, it probably had as much to do w/ NC's pace and SC's rust as anything else.
Even though Clowney was winded (and lazy) he still disrupted UNC's offense on multiple occasions. You could tell they were accounting for him most of the night and it altered their schemes. I have no doubt he'll find a 2nd or 3rd wind against the Dawgs next Sat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter