Started By
Message
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:21 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
oh so now the bitching has changed to it was 2012 a&m game that was moved.
Changed from when? LSU fans have been on top of this for a solid year now.
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:21 am to bamasgot13
quote:
Negative. We know that (some) LSU fans are constantly looking for excuses. The schedule has been the convenient one lately, but before that it was Mulligans, PP7 was in bounds, refs never call holding on Bama, it goes on and on.
The 2014 schedule excuse is "of course Bama gets Florida at home. The schedule makers just refuse to make Bama go on the road". Nevermind that the last time the two teams met in the regular season it was AT Florida. Nevermind the fact that Florida plays cross division rotating opponent AT home this year while Bama plays cross division rotating opponent on the road. Those facts don't further the LSU propaganda and excuses. Like I said, you sound pathetic. Probably because you are.
If you don't understand how much bigger of a deal rotating opponents are under a 6-1-1 than they were under a 5-2-1 then you're not very smart.
The rotations now play a huge role in who ends up going to Atlanta. Just look at last season for instance. LSU, Texas A&M and Alabama all beat each other and went 5-1 against the SEC West. LSU and A&M both played at least one of the top 2 teams in the East. Alabama played none. Guess who went to Atlanta?
I don't care about holding calls or interceptions or mulligans or even who gets who at home and when. I care about competitive balance. We shouldn't have a league where the schedule makers have a large hand in who represents each division in Atlanta but right now that's the way it is. I don't think there's a conspiracy or anything like that, It's a complete clusterfrick to try to make a 14 team, 8 game schedule and still include all these permanent games from the other division and the league office hasn't been able to figure it out. That's affecting all of us. Luckily for you it has affected you in a positive way so you don't really care about it. That's all fine and good but to just call us "whiners" or whatever when it has been affecting us negatively is just a cheap and empty response as is the nonsense I'm responding to here. ADDRESS THE DAMN ISSUE FOR A CHANGE!!!
This post was edited on 8/21/13 at 10:23 am
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:22 am to boXerrumble
quote:
So Auburn, A&M, and Bama won't make return trips to Gainesville
I'm pretty sure the plan is to still rotate the games, just not to home and homes with the rotating cross-divisional teams so that players will get to play against more teams in their careers.
EDIT:
quote:
Part of today's announcement is that there will be no set SEC schedule rotation until 2016.
Or maybe not
This post was edited on 8/21/13 at 10:27 am
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:23 am to Choupique19
Bama doesn't return to UF in 2015
quote:
Robbie Andreu
?@RobbieAndreu
My bad. The 2014 schedule is a one-year deal. Alabama is not UF's rotating opponent from the West. TBD
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:24 am to More beer please
quote:
Part of today's announcement is that there will be no set SEC schedule rotation until 2016
and to think originally we were told we'd only have ONE bridge schedule
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:25 am to boXerrumble
quote:
My bad. The 2014 schedule is a one-year deal. Alabama is not UF's rotating opponent from the West. TBD
Obviously. Rotating East-West matchups have only been for one year since we went to 14 teams. That's no secret and shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody. You don't see LSU @USCe or A&M@UF or Mizzou@Alabama this year do you? Alabama will likely be at USC or at UGA in 2015.
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:29 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
and to think originally we were told we'd only have ONE bridge schedule
Under the bridge schedule, Bama hasn't received Vandy yet.
2015 Vandy at Bama LOCK!!
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:34 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
The rotations now play a huge role in who ends up going to Atlanta. Just look at last season for instance. LSU, Texas A&M and Alabama all beat each other and went 5-1 against the SEC West. LSU and A&M both played at least one of the top 2 teams in the East. Alabama played none. Guess who went to Atlanta?
Same thing happened in the East last year, too. UGA, USC, UF all went 5-1 against the east, and all beat each other. USC and UF played at least one top team from the west, with UF getting the shaft and playing both. UGA played none. UGA in Atlanta.
Scheduling matters. It shouldn't, but it does.
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:35 am to Choupique19
wonder if the hold off to 2016 means...
1 - 9 games, probably
2 - expansion
3 - both
1 - 9 games, probably
2 - expansion
3 - both
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:36 am to RoyalAir
quote:
Scheduling matters. It shouldn't, but it does.
I dont see how this is even debatable but apparently it is
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:37 am to RoyalAir
quote:
Scheduling matters. It shouldn't, but it does.
And when the schedule is not even based off of a rotation, it's just randomly put together by some Alabama grad, and Alabama (and UGA) just happend to benefit from that "random" schedule every year...
If it looks like a rat, walks like a rat, and smells like a rat...
This post was edited on 8/21/13 at 11:09 am
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:38 am to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
1 - 9 games, probably
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:41 am to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
wonder if the hold off to 2016 means...
1 - 9 games, probably
2 - expansion
3 - both
The problem that I have with the 9-game schedule is that it completely screws over those schools that have annual games outside of the conference. UK/UL, USC/CLEM, UF/FSU, and UGA/GT (if Tech ever gets their act together) also have to be factored into the equation. If, and it's a big if, but if the Big 12-2 would quit being pussies, aTm/Tx and Mizzou/Kansas would resume. That's more than half the league that gets dicked over in a nine-game conference schedule.
People already complain enough about the lack of quality OOC scheduling amongst SEC schools. It'll only get worse with a nine-game sched. You can say goodbye to legit OOC matchups such as UGA/Clem, USC/UNC, UTK/Oregon, MSU/OkieState, Bama/VT, etc.
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:43 am to 3rddownonthe8
Auburn going to UGA & UA...
Auburn will probably go to UGA in 2015 as well.
2013 - UGA @ GT & AU
2014 - UGA @ HOME, GT & AU
2015 - UGA @ HOME - AU, @ GT
This would get Auburn offsetting home - away with UA & UGA
& Likewise UGA for GT & AU.
I'm just not sure why they messed with this year by sending UGA back to AU.
Does anyone know why this was needed. Seems like they are going through their elbow to get to their but??
Auburn will probably go to UGA in 2015 as well.
2013 - UGA @ GT & AU
2014 - UGA @ HOME, GT & AU
2015 - UGA @ HOME - AU, @ GT
This would get Auburn offsetting home - away with UA & UGA
& Likewise UGA for GT & AU.
I'm just not sure why they messed with this year by sending UGA back to AU.
Does anyone know why this was needed. Seems like they are going through their elbow to get to their but??
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:45 am to Choupique19
quote:
and Alabama (and UGA) just happend to benefit from that "random" schedule every year...
How will we benefit next year? We play UF early in the season while breaking in a new QB. I wouldn't consider that getting a break. And do throw out the fact that we don't get a return trip to the swamp, because we will more than likely go to UGA in 2015.
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:45 am to Choupique19
quote:
And when the schedule is not even based off of a rotation, it's just randomly put together by some Alabama grad, and Alabama (and UGA) just happend to benefit from that "random" schedule every year...
I think the only way to do this, if we're hellbent to hold onto the traditional inter-division rivalries (doesn't matter to me, but I understand *why* it does to Bama/UTK, UGA/AUB and OleMiss/Vandy to a lesser extent), then the only logical way to fix the scheds is to radically shake up the conference divisions and go with the pods idea.
Or we can just ignore that it's an issue. Which seems to be what the SEC is doing.
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:47 am to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
Auburn will probably go to UGA in 2015 as well.
I am thinking it will be the bama game that gets switched H&A, not UGA with this new release
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:51 am to NYCAuburn
I don't think so , UGA wont keep GT & AU both at home or both away.
Posted on 8/21/13 at 10:51 am to Bamatab
quote:
because we will more than likely go to UGA in 2015.
You were "more than likely" supposed to play UGA this and got kentucky instead.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News