Started By
Message

re: Almost 2 years in and Missouri still does not feel like it is part of Conference

Posted on 8/9/13 at 3:06 pm to
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

How were South Carolina and Arkansas in their first year? In their first five years? This shite is a non-issue.


My question is not referring to how well they performed their first season in the league. It is whether their addition is a benefit to the league and a "fit" with the other teams. They very well may have good seasons (but will most likely fall somewhere between Ole Miss and MSU over the long run).
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 8/9/13 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

My question is not referring to how well they performed their first season in the league. It is whether their addition is a benefit to the league and a "fit" with the other teams. They very well may have good seasons (but will most likely fall somewhere between Ole Miss and MSU over the long run).


Right, in other words your original post and question isn't directed at peformance or anything at all quantifiable but rather the usual bunch of vague theoretical shite like fit and a bunch of Nostradomus bullshite that's impossible for anyone to prove or argue against so you must be right. Which is the same shitty post that pops up on the Rant every Tuesday or so with 50 other frickers chiming in to flame or take it off on a tangent. Which is why your thread sucks donkey balls.
This post was edited on 8/9/13 at 3:20 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter