Started By
Message
re: The myth of Texas A&M football
Posted on 7/22/13 at 12:07 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 7/22/13 at 12:07 pm to Draconian Sanctions
LSU's excuse for losing to Bama at home when A&M beat them on the road is that LSU caused Bama to be tired.
We hove to throw out all the other "factors" and focus ONLY on that one factor. Forget home field advantage. Forget LSU's bye week. No. The ONLY difference was that LSU made Bama tired. That's why A&M beat Bama and LSU couldn't. That's what we keep hearing.
Nobody here claims their stadium is insurmountable as much as LSU does. But Bama walks in there and gets the W. So, A&M MUST have had help winning in T-town. Must have. It had to be the awesomnessednessitudedness of LSU.
We hove to throw out all the other "factors" and focus ONLY on that one factor. Forget home field advantage. Forget LSU's bye week. No. The ONLY difference was that LSU made Bama tired. That's why A&M beat Bama and LSU couldn't. That's what we keep hearing.
Nobody here claims their stadium is insurmountable as much as LSU does. But Bama walks in there and gets the W. So, A&M MUST have had help winning in T-town. Must have. It had to be the awesomnessednessitudedness of LSU.
5
Posted on 7/22/13 at 12:11 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Nobody here claims their stadium is insurmountable as much as LSU does.
Nobody has ever said insurmountable
All we have ever said is that as far as home field advantages go ours is the best or very close too it. Very few neutrals would argue that.
Posted on 7/22/13 at 12:13 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
LSU's excuse for losing to Bama at home when A&M beat them on the road is that LSU caused Bama to be tired.
We hove to throw out all the other "factors" and focus ONLY on that one factor. Forget home field advantage. Forget LSU's bye week. No. The ONLY difference was that LSU made Bama tired. That's why A&M beat Bama and LSU couldn't. That's what we keep hearing.
There's a difference between being tired and undisciplined/unfocused/hungover. If Alabama was tired, then why didn't A&M score several more touchdowns after the 1st quarter? Was Alabama magically not tired after A&M's explosive first quarter? No. You used the wrong word. AJ was off his game and banged up, and that was really the difference between a win and a loss. Two underthrown deep balls resulted in turnovers on the following set of of downs.
Posted on 7/22/13 at 12:15 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Nobody here claims their stadium is insurmountable as much as LSU does. But Bama walks in there and gets the W. So, A&M MUST have had help winning in T-town. Must have. It had to be the awesomnessednessitudedness of LSU
You do realize that the LSU-Bama series is odd in the fact that the home team usually loses more than the visiting team, right?
I mean, hell, Bama didn't lose in Tiger Stadium for like thirty years. Doesn't mean LSU never won.
And look at LSU-Bama in 2011, in T-town.
Bama actually loses more at home than on the road for some odd reason.
This post was edited on 7/22/13 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 7/22/13 at 12:23 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
It had to be the awesomnessednessitudedness of LSU.
I'll have to agree with you on that one.
Posted on 7/22/13 at 12:40 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
KaiserSoze99
You sound insecure.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News