Started By
Message

re: 2013 SEC defenses - will they regress?

Posted on 6/18/13 at 11:37 pm to
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Bama won't be inexperienced on the d-line. Bama rotates the DL a lot, so most of the DLs that play a lot of minutes had plenty of playing time last year. When has Saban not had a top 5 defense at Bama outside of his 1st year? Last year and in 2010 were our most inexperienced defenses, and both were top 5 defenses (if not top 3).


The SEC will field good defenses. I am asking if you think the league will regress overall defensively. Regression doesn't mean they will be bad or mediocre. Regression just means they will slip overall even if slightly.

Bama reloads. We all know that.
This post was edited on 6/18/13 at 11:38 pm
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38386 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

I am asking if you think the league will regress overall defensively


I doubt it. The last time I checked the high schools in the southeast were still producing animals and sending them to the SEC.

Basically, the top 4-5 defenses in the SEC will be the top 4-5 defenses in the nation
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 6/19/13 at 8:56 am to
quote:

I am asking if you think the league will regress overall defensively.


Auburn wont regress unless they play with 8 players instead of 11...and that is debatable.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter