Started By
Message

re: 2013 SEC defenses - will they regress?

Posted on 6/18/13 at 11:34 pm to
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15112 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 11:34 pm to
Bama won't be inexperienced on the d-line. Bama rotates the DL a lot, so most of the DLs that will play a lot of minutes had plenty of playing time last year.

When has Saban not had a top 5 defense at Bama outside of his 1st year? Last year and in 2010 were our most inexperienced defenses, and both were top 5 defenses (if not top 3).
This post was edited on 6/18/13 at 11:36 pm
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 6/18/13 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Bama won't be inexperienced on the d-line. Bama rotates the DL a lot, so most of the DLs that play a lot of minutes had plenty of playing time last year. When has Saban not had a top 5 defense at Bama outside of his 1st year? Last year and in 2010 were our most inexperienced defenses, and both were top 5 defenses (if not top 3).


The SEC will field good defenses. I am asking if you think the league will regress overall defensively. Regression doesn't mean they will be bad or mediocre. Regression just means they will slip overall even if slightly.

Bama reloads. We all know that.
This post was edited on 6/18/13 at 11:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter