Started By
Message

re: Moving Bama and Auburn to the East: isn't that the easiest way?

Posted on 6/10/13 at 6:45 pm to
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Don't worry about who your opponent plays because it has zero affect on your ability to win or lose.


Both Georgia and Bama were given their titles by the phony-baloney bridge schedule last year.

Without the manipulation of the SEC schedules last year, you could not have had both Bama and Georgia in the SEC C.G.

Bama gets Georgia taken off its schedule and TAM gets Florida put on their schedule.

Bama loses to TAM, but still wins the divisional title. And you say schedules don't matter--B.S.!
Posted by Bama74
MS Gulfcoast
Member since Dec 2012
430 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 7:39 pm to
^
So it would have been Bama And Florida in the SECCG again.

Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25953 posts
Posted on 6/10/13 at 10:48 pm to
The schedule didnt give the division to georgia and bama.

South carolina losing to florida (who georgia beat) did.
And LSU losing to Bama did.

South carolina cant worry about who georgia does or doesnt play... because they find ways to lose to the auburns and floridas that are on both uga and usc's schedule.

Win and they are in.
Instead, they crap the bed.


Ive never heard a uga fan complain about the schedule.
We schedule tougher OOC than anyone in conference.
Hell... we're playing at Auburn 2 years in a row.
It is what it is. let's play some football.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter