Started By
Message
re: Basketball Recruiting Thread
Posted on 5/14/14 at 8:56 pm to reedus23
Posted on 5/14/14 at 8:56 pm to reedus23
Alright y'all. If you want to piss and moan about Shamburger, Mizzou, the 2013-2014 team, and next year's team, have at it. I'll stay out of the way.
In the future, the 37 points per game schtick would mean something concrete if you didn't completely ignore the fact that the returning players combined for maybe 30% of a full game's minutes. So, we'll triple that 37 number and we're up to 100+ points in a full game. Now we're both using that 37 number in a completely inappropriate manner, but at least I didn't get left behind.
In the future, the 37 points per game schtick would mean something concrete if you didn't completely ignore the fact that the returning players combined for maybe 30% of a full game's minutes. So, we'll triple that 37 number and we're up to 100+ points in a full game. Now we're both using that 37 number in a completely inappropriate manner, but at least I didn't get left behind.
This post was edited on 5/14/14 at 8:57 pm
2
Posted on 5/14/14 at 9:13 pm to MIZ_STL
quote:
Alright y'all. If you want to piss and moan about Shamburger, Mizzou, the 2013-2014 team, and next year's team, have at it. I'll stay out of the way.
I'm seriously not pissing and moaning. I also wouldn't be a bit surprised if Clark is a better PG than him next year and Shamburger is the backup.
Posted on 5/14/14 at 11:36 pm to MIZ_STL
Brother, I ain't pissing and moaning about Shamburger. But I'm also not going to drop to my knees and praise him as the second coming. I might do that with Gant, but Shamburger is gonna have to show me he's Gant-like good.
Also, you can't just triple everyone's numbers because then you have 10 guys playing 3x's whatever they played to get their averages. Without looking it up, Clark for instance played over 20 minutes a game. Simply tripling his numbers would result in a game in excess of 60 minutes. I did break it down by points by minute and it is slightly better but still not great and certainly no where near 100 points. But even then, some assumptions have to be made that we don't know, such as how many minutes will Jones play per game next year. And Bello. And Post. And so on.
Also, you can't just triple everyone's numbers because then you have 10 guys playing 3x's whatever they played to get their averages. Without looking it up, Clark for instance played over 20 minutes a game. Simply tripling his numbers would result in a game in excess of 60 minutes. I did break it down by points by minute and it is slightly better but still not great and certainly no where near 100 points. But even then, some assumptions have to be made that we don't know, such as how many minutes will Jones play per game next year. And Bello. And Post. And so on.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News