re: Weren't we told that 2013 would be the last "bridge" schedule?

quote:

---

No we don't. Everyone knew there would be a bridge, and the SEC wanted the two new teams to play the premier teams in the league as their first two opponents to kinda "put em on the map" if you will. A&M was in the West so they were already playing Bama so they got UF from the East. Mizzou was in the East, and well who's the premier program in the West??? Exxxaaaacctttllly. STOP YOUR BITCHING. Put your big boy pants on and win more games. Period.

---

Except this year you guys draw the 2 worst teams from the east by far. But hey, I don't give a frick. The disparity between LSU and Alabama football in actual reality is really fricking small and roles could just as easily be reversed with lsu winning the last 2 titles. But that is not the perception but its the reality. And I don't give a frick anymore. When its that close these little things you guys won't admit are "advantages", in reality it's fricking huge.

Anyone here actually believe they were going to let LSU win in 11? Think what that would have meant? Miles (the supposed buffoon) would have his 2nd NC and possibly the greatest college team of all time. Beat Saban 3/4 while he only had 1 title at bama.

Then our recruiting doesn't fall apart etc etc etc. destroying LSU has been job one, and its working, but the roles could EASILY be reversed. But it's not over, and idgaf.