Started By
Message
Why not let SEC rival schools schedule each other as non-conference games?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 5/24/13 at 2:58 pm
Why not let SEC schools who are bent on keeping cross divisional rivalries an annual event, play them as non-conference games?
They would get to continue their tradition, continue bragging rights, compete for recruiting, and generate more income and interest than playing a near Division 2 school, or they can choose to drop it.
Then we could keep a schedule that rotates fairly.
They would get to continue their tradition, continue bragging rights, compete for recruiting, and generate more income and interest than playing a near Division 2 school, or they can choose to drop it.
Then we could keep a schedule that rotates fairly.
13
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:46 pm to tigbit
Bc they want to keep their rivalry AND their easy schedule. They won't give up one for the other.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:49 pm to tigbit
And who decides which are in conference and which are OOC?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:51 pm to tigbit
b/c Slive lives in a bama neighborhood.
you never know who is screwin' whom.
you never know who is screwin' whom.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:52 pm to RBWilliams8
Because its not about the rivalries, its about keeping bama's schedule light.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:52 pm to Dalosaqy
quote:
And who decides which are in conference and which are OOC?
simple. the conference would set up a rotation and that would be the conference schedule. if bama and tennessee game isn't set up by the conference, then they could schedule the game on their own and it would not impact conference records, only their total records.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:55 pm to Springlake Tiger
The conference chooses. Uh, no thanks. Seen that movie, hoss.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:58 pm to Springlake Tiger
quote:
simple. the conference would set up a rotation and that would be the conference schedule. if bama and tennessee game isn't set up by the conference, then they could schedule the game on their own and it would not impact conference records, only their total records.
This is actually one of the more creative solutions I've seen to this silliness.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 4:30 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
This is actually one of the more creative solutions I've seen to this silliness.
Agree. Slive would spin a flaw though... Or just ignore it all together.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 4:42 pm to RBWilliams8
Disagree. You play an SEC opponent, you play for keeps.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 5:07 pm to Dalosaqy
quote:
Disagree
sorry, but you are wrong.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:47 pm to Dalosaqy
quote:
Dalosaqy Why not let SEC rival schools schedule each other as non-conference games? And who decides which are in conference and which are OOC?
The standard sec schedule would apply, with each year rotating the cross divisional match ups.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:50 pm to tigbit
Seriously?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:54 pm to tigbit
You meant to post this on the Tiger Rant?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:01 pm to cornhat
quote:
Dalosaqy Why not let SEC rival schools schedule each other as non-conference games? And who decides which are in conference and which are OOC?
Why do you say that?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:31 pm to tigbit
Why is LSU being a bitch?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:32 pm to tigbit
Why don't LSU fans quit complaining?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:39 pm to tigbit
If that wish was granted, then every permanent cross-division game would be played except LSU-UF and maybe USC-Arky (or USC-A&M). I'm ok with stopping those two
Posted on 5/24/13 at 10:40 pm to tigbit
Because that's just stupid
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News