Started By
Message
So who will be hosting next week?
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:12 pm
Vandy and LSU appear to be locks.
With Arkansas dropping two to Auburn, it looks like they are out of the running. Comes down to Mississippi St., South Carolina, or both.
With Arkansas dropping two to Auburn, it looks like they are out of the running. Comes down to Mississippi St., South Carolina, or both.
6
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:16 pm to Broski
quote:
Arkansas dropping two to Auburn
What a fall from grace
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:16 pm to Broski
Vandy and LSU National seeds
South Carolina and Mississippi State host.
South Carolina and Mississippi State host.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:22 pm to Broski
This is all new to you?
Posted on 5/18/13 at 5:58 pm to Broski
Vandy and LSU national seeds.
South Carolina hosts a regional.
South Carolina hosts a regional.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:11 pm to The Boat
Is it just me or does any else notice how much the LSU fans do not want MSU to host? Does this go back to them not making the tournament a few years back with a similar conference & total record as MSU has this year?
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:13 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
Is it just me or does any else notice how much the LSU fans do not want MSU to host? Does this go back to them not making the tournament a few years back with a similar conference & total record as MSU has this year?
I actually want as many SEC teams as possible to host, that way, the chances of an all-SEC super regional dwindle.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:15 pm to spacewrangler
quote:
Is it just me or does any else notice how much the LSU fans do not want MSU to host? Does this go back to them not making the tournament a few years back with a similar conference & total record as MSU has this year?
Yes, yes it does.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:16 pm to The Boat
quote:
Vandy and LSU national seeds.
South Carolina and MSU host a regional.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:22 pm to Broski
quote:I will have to think about that one
I actually want as many SEC teams as possible to host, that way, the chances of an all-SEC super regional dwindle.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:24 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
I will have to think about that one
Think about what?
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:29 pm to Broski
in essence you just stated that you want SEC teams to be successful so they can be unsuccessful.... 
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:29 pm to Broski
quote:More likely to meet another SEC team in a Super by being a 2 seed elsewhere and winning that that hosting and being lined up against another SEC team that's a national seed.
Think about what?
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:30 pm to pivey14
quote:
in essence you just stated that you want SEC teams to be successful so they can be unsuccessful....
Que?
I think you're lost.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:31 pm to Broski
Not a bit. See DiamondDawg.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:40 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:Didn't seem to matter much last year. I bet it holds the same amount of water now as it did then.
What a fall from grace
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:41 pm to Drewbie
quote:
Didn't seem to matter much last year. I bet it holds the same amount of water now as it did then.
Then why were y'all so gung-ho about boasting that preseason #1 like it did hold water?
Posted on 5/18/13 at 6:45 pm to pivey14
quote:Actually, what I said makes sense. But, admittedly, what he said also makes sense. The more that host the less likely there is an all SEC Super matchup. I told him I needed to think about it but he goaded me into replying before I could think (tomorrow).
Not a bit. See DiamondDawg.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 7:01 pm to pivey14
What Broski is saying he seemed like to see as few SEC teams have to play each other in the superregional round.
Posted on 5/18/13 at 7:02 pm to Emergent C Steve
Gotcha 
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News