Started By
Message
re: Is Alabama really a dynasty??
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:16 am to blackmamba
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:16 am to blackmamba
quote:
The BCS is a beauty pageant that looks at style points and stats to qualify.
How else do you expect them to differentiate between teams with identical records and no way to have a tie breaker like you would for conference selection
ETA. and if it wasnt for those style, beauty points, and stats, where would LSU have ended up in 07'. it because of that, you were placed into the game
This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 9:22 am
2
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:18 am to Herman Frisco
quote:
If everyone will be honest, you know that Bama has only been very luckey to win the games which they won.
And they had the refs bought off.
And they cheat in every way under the sun.
The REC pays players.
Oh, and they cheat.
Therefore they are a dynasty of cheaters.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:19 am to mwlewis
Bump
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:23 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Wait, what??? how was stanford left out?
Stanford, with Harbaugh coaching and Luck at QB...definitely one of the best teams that year. Not sure how everyone would have handled them in a playoff
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:24 am to EvilVodka
What was their record?
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:25 am to EvilVodka
quote:
Stanford, with Harbaugh coaching and Luck at QB...definitely one of the best teams that year. Not sure how everyone would have handled them in a playoff
So....you want to just place them into the game? even though they lost to the team, that was in the game. hmmm, what does that sound like
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:28 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
So....you want to just place them into the game? even though they lost to the team, that was in the game. hmmm, what does that sound like
Their hatred for everything Alabama has clouded their judgement.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:30 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
How else do you expect them to differentiate between teams with identical records and no way to have a tie breaker like you would for conference selection
ETA. and if it wasnt for those style, beauty points, and stats, where would LSU have ended up in 07'. it because of that, you were placed into the game
'07 was sort of an odd year....if not LSU, than who? #3 in the BCS was Virginia Tech, whom LSU beat earlier in the season...
I think in a playoff, USC and Georgia would have had strong arguments to be there
probably would have been:
#1 Ohio State vs. USC
#2 LSU vs. #3 Virginia Tech in a rematch
Georgia left out, unless they got in ahead of USC
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:30 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
So....you want to just place them into the game? even though they lost to the team, that was in the game. hmmm, what does that sound like
His style is to make a terrible argument, get shot down, and then move on to the next terrible argument. Lets see what the next one is.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:31 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
So....you want to just place them into the game? even though they lost to the team, that was in the game. hmmm, what does that sound like
In a playoff, that's what you would have gotten
#1 Auburn vs. Stanford
#2 Oregon vs. #3 TCU
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:32 am to Patton
quote:
What was their record?
Stanford '10?? 11-1 I think
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:32 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
His style is to make a terrible argument, get shot down, and then move on to the next terrible argument. Lets see what the next one is.
you don't have any arguments
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:34 am to EvilVodka
I dont need any arguments. Bama is a dynasty. Everyone agrees but the assgriefed LSU fans, and that OSU alter.
Im really just here to laugh at your dumb arse. You are pretty solid entertainment.
Im really just here to laugh at your dumb arse. You are pretty solid entertainment.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:35 am to EvilVodka
LSU fans are such bitches, cry cry cry. Who cares we on top, yal lost to an ACC school. How does that feel?
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:36 am to EvilVodka
quote:
In a playoff, that's what you would have gotten #1 Auburn vs. Stanford #2 Oregon vs. #3 TCU
Actually it would have been wisconsin, they finished higher than stanford prior to the bowl games
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:37 am to NYCAuburn
ssssshhhhhhh
Let him think he knows what he is talking about. He is hanging in there by a string. Who knows what another blow to his fragile confidence could bring.
Let him think he knows what he is talking about. He is hanging in there by a string. Who knows what another blow to his fragile confidence could bring.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:39 am to EvilVodka
quote:Kansas an hawaii both had better records than LSU. again if it wasnt for style points LSU would not have been there
'07 was sort of an odd year....if not LSU, than who?
ETA and Mizzou had an identical record and conference champ
This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 9:42 am
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:43 am to TreyAnastasio
this thread and the Cowherd one are ridiculous
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:43 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
How else do you expect them to differentiate between teams with identical records and no way to have a tie breaker like you would for conference selection
I didn't say I have a better option. My point was that bama only won the SEC title 2 times in 4 years and people are screaming dynasty. 2 out of 4 is hardly a dynasty.
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:45 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
1-loss FSU team that probably could have beaten both
Michigan was legit, IMO Nebraska '97 rolled through an easy schedule, needed the miraculous catch against Missouri (was that the 5th down catch??), and had freaking Scott Frost at QB...
FSU had a pretty stout D that year...their only slip up was against Florida at the end of the year. I don't think either Michigan or Nebraska would have wanted to play them in a playoff...
Page 19 of 34
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News