Started By
Message
re: SI: Post Spring Preseason Top 25
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:30 pm to scrooster
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:30 pm to scrooster
Thoughts:
-LOL at the Stanford hate. They would wax dat arse of almost all SEC teams. The top 6 could give em a game, but only Bama and A&M could beat them IMO. Shaw doesn't get enough credit out West.
-I'm curious how OSU does next year. Regardless Meyer will have them competing for NCs very shortly.
-If it wasn't for the NC debacle the ND ranking would be about right. That team was a year, maybe two ahead of schedule last year. Their DL will be beastly this year, and the offense should improve.
-Call it a homer, but I think South Carolina is a little high. I actually think he hit the nail on the head with the Lattimore loss not being that big given that they've never had him for a full season. I know the DL will still be very good, but the back 7 loses a TON and their back 7 never seems to get the credit it deserves. It's been bigtime the last 3 years.
Don't care about whoever is outside the top 10.
-LOL at the Stanford hate. They would wax dat arse of almost all SEC teams. The top 6 could give em a game, but only Bama and A&M could beat them IMO. Shaw doesn't get enough credit out West.
-I'm curious how OSU does next year. Regardless Meyer will have them competing for NCs very shortly.
-If it wasn't for the NC debacle the ND ranking would be about right. That team was a year, maybe two ahead of schedule last year. Their DL will be beastly this year, and the offense should improve.
-Call it a homer, but I think South Carolina is a little high. I actually think he hit the nail on the head with the Lattimore loss not being that big given that they've never had him for a full season. I know the DL will still be very good, but the back 7 loses a TON and their back 7 never seems to get the credit it deserves. It's been bigtime the last 3 years.
Don't care about whoever is outside the top 10.
3
Posted on 5/7/13 at 11:38 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
LOL at the Stanford hate. They would wax dat arse of almost all SEC teams
IMO, Stanford on their best day is pretty close to Florida. But if they had an SEC schedule they would get beat down and be closer to Ole Miss '12 level
Posted on 5/8/13 at 7:52 am to FootballNostradamus
quote:
houghts:
-LOL at the Stanford hate. They would wax dat arse of almost all SEC teams. The top 6 could give em a game, but only Bama and A&M could beat them IMO. Shaw doesn't get enough credit out West.
-I'm curious how OSU does next year. Regardless Meyer will have them competing for NCs very shortly.
-If it wasn't for the NC debacle the ND ranking would be about right. That team was a year, maybe two ahead of schedule last year. Their DL will be beastly this year, and the offense should improve.
-Call it a homer, but I think South Carolina is a little high. I actually think he hit the nail on the head with the Lattimore loss not being that big given that they've never had him for a full season. I know the DL will still be very good, but the back 7 loses a TON and their back 7 never seems to get the credit it deserves. It's been bigtime the last 3 years.
Don't care about whoever is outside the top 10.
It is too early in the morning for the sheep humping taterhead bullshite already. Don't you have a sister or a cousin to butt-pork somewhere, or something? I'll bet the sheep in your house are thankful for these little SECr breaks you afford them from time to time, huh?
Posted on 5/8/13 at 3:53 pm to FootballNostradamus
quote:
-LOL at the Stanford hate. They would wax dat arse of almost all SEC teams. The top 6 could give em a game, but only Bama and A&M could beat them IMO. Shaw doesn't get enough credit out West
You are high off your arse boy. Sure they are physical and well coached but the athletes on the top tier SEC teams are far superior. No doubt about it.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News