Started By
Message
re: A 9-Game SEC Schedule?
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:27 am to Sheetbend
Posted on 5/7/13 at 1:27 am to Sheetbend
quote:
A 9-Game SEC Schedule?
About time I say. There seems to be three points of opposition to this:
1. One less home game every other year. Instead of a 4-4 conference split then 4 games to play with (generally 3 cupcakes/in-state and a 1&done or home/away with a major). Now every other year there will be a 4-5 conference split. The question is will better games increase SEC Network revenue and payout to overcome this.
2. Increased schedule difficulty with national implications. This specifically concerns UF/SCar/UGA who have annual OOC major to begin with. Coach Saban has been preaching since 2011 that difficulty of conference must be taken into account for major invites. Regardless of motivation at the time he's been consistent up to present and I think the other coaches need to get on board and be vocal and honest. They should point out that ND would have done well to finish 5th or 6th in this conference in 2012. This talking point will be important in 2014. Should a 11-1 or 11-2 SEC runnerup be left out for a another conference champion with a better record?
3. A concern to certain teams who struggle to win enough FBS games to qualify for a bowl invite, which would affect revenue for said team
Thus endeth the spiel.
This post was edited on 5/7/13 at 2:04 am
Posted on 5/7/13 at 10:22 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
This talking point will be important in 2014. Should a 11-1 or 11-2 SEC runnerup be left out for a another conference champion with a better record?
A conference runner up shouldn't be in a college football playoff. Conference championships can be an objective way to whittle down the field. Too many teams and too few games to take two or representatives from one conference.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News