Started By
Message
re: "Dear Killz" Advice and Help Column
Posted on 3/20/13 at 4:31 pm to TT9
Posted on 3/20/13 at 4:31 pm to TT9
TT9
First, don't revise scientific research data to favor a specific point of view. That compromises the integrity of the real data.
Second, detonate an EMP 30 miles above the center of China. This would knock China back to the stone age. In an instant their electrical grid would fry, including most of their vehicles which are controlled by computers.
A billion less people driving cars in a society that doesn't regulate car emissions is a good thing.
Win, win!
quote:
How do we curve global warming?
First, don't revise scientific research data to favor a specific point of view. That compromises the integrity of the real data.
Second, detonate an EMP 30 miles above the center of China. This would knock China back to the stone age. In an instant their electrical grid would fry, including most of their vehicles which are controlled by computers.
A billion less people driving cars in a society that doesn't regulate car emissions is a good thing.
Win, win!
This post was edited on 3/20/13 at 4:58 pm
1
Posted on 3/20/13 at 4:48 pm to mizzoukills
quote:quote:
First, don't revise scientific research and data research to favor a specific point of view. That compromises the integrity of the real data.
Second, detonate an EMP 30 miles above the center of China. This would knock China back to the stone age. In an instant their electrical grid would fry, including most of their vehicles which are controlled by computers.
A billion less people would be driving cars in a society that doesn't regulate car emissions.
Win, win!
This might be my favorite answer thus far.
quote:
First, don't revise scientific research and data research to favor a specific point of view. That compromises the integrity of the real data.
And this without a doubt is best advice!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News