Started By
Message

re: Hugh Freeze Quote Ayn Rand????

Posted on 2/5/13 at 11:06 am to
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 2/5/13 at 11:06 am to
quote:

quote:
Is it so bad to let people make wrong decisions and suffer the consequences? It's like aggressor said earlier. Greed has to be balanced by fear in the market place. Bad decisions must be punished with failure and loss. Nothing is more damaging to liberty than dependence. We should be treated as adults. The Statist wants to treat us like children. The left wants to tell us what to do with our money and the right to wants to tell us what to do with ourselves.


Well, yes, it can be bad to make people bear the full brunt of their failure. For one, it inhibits the very risk taking that you claim to value as a free market proponent. And two, it's essentially a pretty shitty way to live: constantly in fear. That doesn't mean people should be guaranteed a living wage at the expense of those who do work or any nonsense like that. But it does mean we can work to smooth the edges of a purely market based economy by implementing a social safety net. Such a failsafe is a recognition that not everyone is the sum of strictly their own personal initiative and abilities, and that those that struggle are not down solely b/c they were judged wanting by the market. The goal of a market economy is to maximize output, and things such as public education, infrastructure upgrades, and unemployment insurance go a long way towards helping us get the most out of our resources and increase that all important marker of economic success: our GDP. A purely market based economy may give you maximum freedom, but frankly living in densely populated areas REQUIRES the surrender of certain freedoms in order to produce a smoothly functioning society. And in reality, a market can be just as constraining on your freedom as a gov't.



This is the slippery slope. How much freedom is too much? How much of a safety net is required? In the end Rand was very Libertarian which essentially was to take a minimalist approach where government's main job is to maintain security and create a fair marketplace where it can judge disputes. She also believed in intellectual property protection.

You can certainly argue the merits of many governmental functions and many things I would agree with you on and honestly I don't know how many things Rand truly would oppose as well. Rand was really about making people think at a core level about what was really necessary from the government and to make people realize and fear the power of government.

You have to remember she grew up in Tzarist Russia, saw the Russian Revolution up close, and was persecuted by the early Soviets before being lucky enough to be able to leave. She saw the abuse of government and the dishonesty of politicians in a way no one on this board ever has and it shaped her views. By the same token you can see how Marx's views were shaped by the abuses of corporations during the Industrial Revolution. Marx simply underestimated the power of the people to control corporations without the government and he had no sense of understanding of human nature.
Posted by CHSgc
Charleston, SC
Member since Oct 2012
1658 posts
Posted on 2/5/13 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

This is the slippery slope. How much freedom is too much? How much of a safety net is required?


Well our form of gov't is an attempt to answer those tough questions. For better or worse, democracy gives the people the gov't they deserve. We can debate how much of a social safety net is needed and be existentially apprehensive that we're destroying our nation in some way b/c we decided to give too much or too little to the poor but that's missing the big picture: which is that we have a govt that allows these tensions to be reconciled through spirited public debate and which usually produces a result that contains input from all sides. So while we're unlikely to ever get a perfect result, we're usually guaranteed that we'll never get an extreme result (which usually produces catastrophe).
Posted by DontCare
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
2516 posts
Posted on 2/5/13 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

a fair marketplace where it can judge disputes

so, what you're saying is that libertarian governance takes a backseat approach to its role in society, except that it has to create "a fair marketplace?" so, what constitutes "fair," in this regard? will it be the sole, autocratic judge of those disputes? who will serve in the judging process? how will it do this? perhaps we should set up some event in which the government can weigh the "fairness" of a given dispute. we could call it a "trial!" then, to insure "fairness," the hands-off libertarian government could apply the results of each trial equally to all its citizens and we could call those rules "laws."

groundbreaking stuff! rand was a true pioneer!

quote:

he had no sense of understanding of human nature
and you're doubly correct about this. i heard that marx actually failed out of his human naturology class at moscow university.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter