Started By
Message
re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:55 pm to 14&Counting
Posted on 1/11/13 at 2:55 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
Never mind the fact that we just got done playing UF and USCe........
This is true. Bama has played USC twice in the past 5 years and UF twice as well (luckily UF's 2 worst seasons in recent history). Played UGA once in past 5 years back in 2008.
LSU has played both UGA and USC twice in the past 5 years and of course plays UF every year.
The obvious and easy conclusion is that Bama should play UGA next year in the "bridge" schedule. But instead Bama gets UK and LSU gets UGA. Why?
1
Posted on 1/11/13 at 3:01 pm to ScoopAndScore
quote:Bama just fricking played UGA and beat 'em. I believe LSU can do the same in this season, don't you?
The obvious and easy conclusion is that Bama should play UGA next year in the "bridge" schedule. But instead Bama gets UK and LSU gets UGA. Why?
Bama doesn't make up the damn schedules, they just play the games and more times than not, they win 'em.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News