Started By
Message
re: Bama would have lost if Colt hadn't got hurt...
Posted on 12/31/12 at 11:19 pm to Hook Em Horns
Posted on 12/31/12 at 11:19 pm to Hook Em Horns
I know one thing...Clemson refused to give up and even though the LSU defense was suffocating at times...Clemson kept on fighting. But I do know one thing...LSU isnt in prime physical condition to go full out 4 qts and werent when we played you guys....S&C coach taking it easy?
LSU defense was done in the late 4th qt. The team that had pep in their step on both sides of the ball was the acc team. Clemson needs to figure out how to cover kicks though...they suck at that.
LSU was tough on defense....but just lacked that killer instinct on the OL.....should have been able to pound Clemson for 300 yds rushing.
LSU defense was done in the late 4th qt. The team that had pep in their step on both sides of the ball was the acc team. Clemson needs to figure out how to cover kicks though...they suck at that.
LSU was tough on defense....but just lacked that killer instinct on the OL.....should have been able to pound Clemson for 300 yds rushing.
2
Posted on 1/1/13 at 12:21 am to reel_gator8
Reel Gator nailed it in the last paragraph. LSU defense was gassed. Makes you wonder about their conditioning. Was same story after Florida game when they blamed the humidity. Lol...like Baton Rouge doesn't have humidity. And who passes on 2nd and 2 and then again on 3rd and 2to with the stable of RBs they have and an OL, while hampered by injuries, that has played pretty well this year?
Posted on 1/1/13 at 12:29 am to reel_gator8
quote:
But I do know one thing...LSU isnt in prime physical condition to go full out 4 qts and werent when we played you guys....S&C coach taking it easy?
You think?
Can't post this enough:
This post was edited on 1/1/13 at 12:31 am
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News