Started By
Message
re: New Alabama Recruiting Strategy
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:03 pm to BrerTiger
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:03 pm to BrerTiger
Obviously the misunderstanding here is when the conference agreement was signed. It would be a non issue if it was signed in December. The issue is that it was signed when he was placed at Hargrave.
The CL wording is confusing. It says OM found out about it earlier this month, not that he signed it earlier this month.
The CL wording is confusing. It says OM found out about it earlier this month, not that he signed it earlier this month.
This post was edited on 12/27/12 at 8:05 pm
2
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:06 pm to HottyToddy7
There is no issue because he signed it earlier this month as stated by the CL, Neal, the AJC, TideSports, and Hill himself.
He was not bound to Bama when he committed to Ole Miss. Ole Miss had Hill sign non-binding paperwork because apparently they were unaware that a Prep school player (unlike a high school senior enrolling early) can sign the binding SEC GIA. A month later he visited Bama, flipped, and signed the binding paperwork.
He was not bound to Bama when he committed to Ole Miss. Ole Miss had Hill sign non-binding paperwork because apparently they were unaware that a Prep school player (unlike a high school senior enrolling early) can sign the binding SEC GIA. A month later he visited Bama, flipped, and signed the binding paperwork.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 8:08 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
The CL wording is confusing. It says OM found out about it earlier this month, not that he signed it earlier this month.
Nope.
quote:
Hill, who verbally committed to Ole Miss in November and publicly said he was switching back to Alabama late last night, was apparently done with the recruiting process after he signed the paper in early December.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News