Started By
Message

re: More LSU butthurting. Leave the SEC?

Posted on 12/25/12 at 11:45 am to
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62426 posts
Posted on 12/25/12 at 11:45 am to
Bama and Auburn to the East solves all of the permanent opponent issues. Why is Bama against that? Are they admitting that schedules are important? Are they admitting that it's possible, that even in the SEC, that one team can have an unfair advantage by playing weaker SEC opponents?
Posted by bona fide
Burma
Member since Jun 2010
8972 posts
Posted on 12/25/12 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Bama and Auburn to the East solves all of the permanent opponent issues. Why is Bama against that?


UA, AU, UGA, UF, UT and the remaining east teams are all against that.
Posted by bamagreycoat
Member since Oct 2012
5749 posts
Posted on 12/25/12 at 11:54 am to
Ok man if Bama and Auburn move to the east will LSU and Bama still play annually? Cause i'm in favor of only Auburn moving to the east and Bama staying in the west. We just trade the east for AU for Mizzou. We can do that and drop permanent opponents if that will calm you good food eating Cajun animals down. I want Bama and AU to stop playing each other annually. Rotate the Bama-AU game just like other non conference games but i want Bama-LSU to be the last games of the regular season.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter