Started By
Message
re: Sagarin Conference Rankings: SEC #2?
Posted on 12/17/12 at 6:14 pm to HarryBalzack
Posted on 12/17/12 at 6:14 pm to HarryBalzack
For some reason, Sagarin always leans too hard on the suck teams. Big XII only had one awful team this year, Kansas. The SEC had three: Kentucky, Auburn, and Arkansas. That's why his rankings are the way they are.
From the top-down, though, it's a no-brainer. Big XII had three teams with 8 or more wins. The SEC had eight to include six with 10 or more wins. Sick.
From the top-down, though, it's a no-brainer. Big XII had three teams with 8 or more wins. The SEC had eight to include six with 10 or more wins. Sick.
1
Posted on 12/17/12 at 6:15 pm to MrSEC
quote:
For some reason, Sagarin always leans too hard on the suck teams. Big XII only had one awful team this year, Kansas. The SEC had three: Kentucky, Auburn, and Arkansas. That's why his rankings are the way they are.
From the top-down, though, it's a no-brainer. Big XII had three teams with 8 or more wins. The SEC had eight to include six with 10 or more wins. Sick.
No. It has to with a dumb statistical bias.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News