quote:
You can't say "oh we didn't bother recruiting them very hard" just because they commit to us and/or started leaning heavily to us. That is pretty Yancy of you, as is your entire point of view in this thread.

I'm frickin sick of having to explain the same thing over and over again. If you disagree with something I say then quote it and explain why.

Once again for the 100th time...

It goes both ways. You didn't go after Davion because we locked him up. We didnt go after Jake because you locked him up.

We lost out on a lot of players to various schools. We have 9 slots left and we would choose to fill them with two commits (Kailo) who many feel is not yours, and Cox. You have two leans that we would make room in with Shump and Z. It you disagree with that then quote it and explain why. If you don't then stop bringing it up on every single page. I don't know how many times I have to explain it. This thread is retarded and yes because I keep posting novels, but what makes it retarded is its the name novels over and over. Please to Gpd explain why it's confusing

This post was edited on 12/7/12 at 4:34 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by engie

Member since Jan 2012

8953 posts

Posted on 12/7/12 at 5:17 pm to Whereisomaha

WiO's argument has now done a complete 180 - per the usual!

You said:

quote:
We have head 2 head instate battles with Conner, Kailo, Shumpert, Bouldin, and Buchanan. Those kids were pursued heavily by both schools and both schools would make room for any of them.

To which I replied:

quote:
If Bouldin gets included in this list, Mix and Thomas damn sure do as well...You couldn't have possibly gone any harder after Thomas than you tried to prior to his commitment.

Now you come back with:

quote:
It goes both ways. You didn't go after Davion because we locked him up. We didnt go after Jake because you locked him up.

Good to see you now agree with me after spending the last half dozen replies arguing this point!

quote:
. This thread is retarded and yes because I keep posting novels, but what makes it retarded is its the name novels over and over. Please to Gpd explain why it's confusing

It is all these things primarily because you can't form a logical viewpoint and/or conclusion and stick to it! If you aren't prepared to debate it logically, don't engage it on that level. Just the usual "OM Stacked, State fricked" would have sufficed...