Started By
Message
re: Why Does the SEC Deserve 2 Teams in the NC?
Posted on 11/24/12 at 9:00 pm to WicKed WayZ
Posted on 11/24/12 at 9:00 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
What matters is this year. And Oregon didn't beat Stanford this year.
Well Alabama didn't beat A&M this year and UGA didn't beat SC this year. Why do they deserve a shot over Oregon or K State? Because of reputation from previous seasons which is my point of this entire thread that these SEC teams get an advantage over the rest of the country because previous years. That's a problem
This post was edited on 11/24/12 at 9:03 pm
2
Posted on 11/24/12 at 9:08 pm to bhart99
You're an idiot. Because they lost when you can lose. Early in the season. You can't lose late in the season and they did. Oregon does it every year they lose late in the season and that's why they don't play for a title. Kansas State really doesnt deserve to be in the discussion. They lost to a average Baylor team. GA lost to number 12 really really early in the year. Bama lost to number 9
Posted on 11/24/12 at 9:14 pm to bhart99
It's all about timing of losses. Florida lost earlier than Oregon to the 3rd ranked team. Oregon lost last week and can't play for their conference championship game. If they did then no doubt they deserve it more than Florida. But as of right now they don't deserve it anymore than Florida.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News