Started By
Message
4
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:51 pm to WG_Dawg
Bama, Auburn, LSU, Arky(make no mistake, they will emerge once again), Miss State, and A&M in the west?
Which is fair, here?
Which is fair, here?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:56 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Bama, Auburn, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Carolina in the east...yeah, that's fair.
Congrats LSU for winning the west 25 of the next 30 years.
Also, congrats on the SEC Champ perennially having 2 or more losses. The East would be near impossible to go undefeated in most years. Also, who'd be Alabama's new SEC West rival? Auburn's? That presents another dilemma.
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:07 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Bama, Auburn, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee, Carolina & Ky. in the east
frick it, if they do this lets just recruit FSU, Clemson & NC St. & start out own conference, screw the West...
Posted on 11/13/12 at 2:36 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Congrats LSU for winning the west 25 of the next 30 years.
I don't really care either way (and I think that would be stupid to change to those divisions), but it is hilarious to me how every other team says "suck it up and just play Florida" "quit whining" "who cares these rivalries must remain in place no matter how it messes with the schedule" "teams are cyclical and Tennessee will be good again" etc...
but when this realignment is brought up, it's "this isn't fair the East would be too hard!" and give no thought to if it is cyclical then Arkansas, State and A&M could all get good and make the West competitive as well
Eighteen=lover of stupid message board hypocrisy
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 2:40 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News