Started By
Message
By the stats Grinders #4
Posted on 10/12/12 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 10/12/12 at 12:47 pm
Yes, I know we haven't played competition, just thought it was interesting. Statistical Rankings
13
Posted on 10/12/12 at 12:50 pm to skirpnasty
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:00 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
haven't played competition
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:17 pm to skirpnasty
No championship?
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:20 pm to skirpnasty
MSU record is 0-0 vs teams with a winning % above .500.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:20 pm to SwayzeBalla
La Tech #11. aTm #14. Maybe that other thread holds a bit of traction... 
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:21 pm to SwayzeBalla
quote:
No championship?
Bama has the West locked up so no conference championship to go along with the Egg Bowl championship this year it seems.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:21 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
MSU record is 0-0 vs teams with a winning % above .500.
And after we whup Tennessee, we will still be at 0-0.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:21 pm to InVolNerable
I'm so bored.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:22 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
no
quote:
Egg Bowl championship
quote:
this year
FIFY
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:25 pm to InVolNerable
quote:
La Tech #11. aTm #14. Maybe that other thread holds a bit of traction...
Looks like the glaring negative in regards to A&M is the miscues. If we can get Harris and Michael to hold onto the got damn ball and not turn it over 6 times this game, fixes that problem.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:25 pm to madmaxvol
quote:
MSU record is 0-0 vs teams with a winning % above .500.
I'll take no losses to teams above .500 as compared to 2 regardless.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:29 pm to skirpnasty
I'll take top 5. 
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:31 pm to skirpnasty
Cincinnati is #6. Rutgers is #10.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:34 pm to Bose Ikard
Yeah it is extremely reliant on who you have played obviously, the only stat that doesn't change much with competition would be the miscues, and even that will change a little. This should be interesting to look at by season's end when the information is more complete though.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:34 pm to skirpnasty
MSU is currently ranked #4
Rankings by Grinders Competition (Div 1A Only):
Troy - #78
Kentucky - #96t
Auburn - #111
UT is currently ranked #43
Rankings by UT's competition (Div 1A only):
Florida - #7
Georgia - #34
NC State - #66
Akron - #110
Rankings by Grinders Competition (Div 1A Only):
Troy - #78
Kentucky - #96t
Auburn - #111
UT is currently ranked #43
Rankings by UT's competition (Div 1A only):
Florida - #7
Georgia - #34
NC State - #66
Akron - #110
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:35 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
I'll take no losses to teams above .500 as compared to 2 regardless.
You can't avoid teams with winning records forever in this league. Eventually you have to play somebody...
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:36 pm to madmaxvol
Check out our next 7 games.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:37 pm to skirpnasty
That's actually a pretty decent measure to rank teams. Offensive efficiency and defensive efficiency instead of bulk stats like total yards is a much better measure.
You could argue that points per play is better than yards per play.
You could argue that points per play is better than yards per play.
Posted on 10/12/12 at 1:37 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
Check out our next 7 games.
That was my point...
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News