Started By
Message
re: ESPN: "Alabama is #1 and #2 isn't Even CLOSE!"
Posted on 9/18/12 at 2:00 pm to white beans
Posted on 9/18/12 at 2:00 pm to white beans
quote:
bama was never interested in winning that game bc it was meaningless. they were only concerned about winning the one that mattered, of course.
Sort of like how LSU was never interested in winning the other one because they'd already won the first one?
Do you see where this series of arguments could be seen as pointless, cyclical and stupid? And why one might say that we're wasting time even discussing it and should just let the game be played and the chips fall where they may?
Or am I wasting my time trying to be reasonable and rational?
2
Posted on 9/18/12 at 2:02 pm to cyde
quote:
Or am I wasting my time trying to be reasonable and rational?
Yes. There is no room for your logic here.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 2:03 pm to cyde
quote:
Or am I wasting my time trying to be reasonable and rational?
You are posting in a place called the SEC Rant. Kinda obvious reason rational and logic are at the bottom of the list.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News