Started By
Message
re: ESPN: "Alabama is #1 and #2 isn't Even CLOSE!"
Posted on 9/18/12 at 1:51 pm to cyde
Posted on 9/18/12 at 1:51 pm to cyde
it's amazing how a single win equates to "absolute superiority" over another team. 2 months earlier, little bama frat boys were crying like whores on national television after their team quit on them in overtime.
bama was never interested in winning that game bc it was meaningless. they were only concerned about winning the one that mattered, of course.
gumps gonna gump.
bama was never interested in winning that game bc it was meaningless. they were only concerned about winning the one that mattered, of course.
gumps gonna gump.
2
Posted on 9/18/12 at 1:55 pm to white beans
quote:
they were only concerned about winning the one that mattered, of course.
and the only ones it appeared. Haters gonna hate.
But I digress, bama shouldn't have even been there amirite?
Posted on 9/18/12 at 2:00 pm to white beans
quote:
bama was never interested in winning that game bc it was meaningless. they were only concerned about winning the one that mattered, of course.
Sort of like how LSU was never interested in winning the other one because they'd already won the first one?
Do you see where this series of arguments could be seen as pointless, cyclical and stupid? And why one might say that we're wasting time even discussing it and should just let the game be played and the chips fall where they may?
Or am I wasting my time trying to be reasonable and rational?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News