Started By
Message

re: Louisville and Arkansas after Petrino - interesting parallels

Posted on 9/10/12 at 2:45 pm to
Posted by LRHogFan
Member since Sep 2010
643 posts
Posted on 9/10/12 at 2:45 pm to
I see the parallels but draw a somewhat different conclusion from them. I think he would have kept us among the elite and in the title hunt for years to come. At Louisville and at Arkansas, especially in the state that the Arkansas program was in when CBP inherited it, you had to win with good players before you could win with great players. He wasn't a master recruiter, but his teams got better each year as he started playing with more and more of his own players. Winning makes recruiting a lot easier. He just wasn't at either program long enough to get the full benefit of the recruiting boost that came along with his winning ways. I attribute the big drop-off at both places after he left largely to CBP just being that good.
This post was edited on 9/10/12 at 2:47 pm
Posted by BTHog
Member since Jul 2012
8335 posts
Posted on 9/10/12 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

I think he would have kept us among the elite


dude, he never had us in the elite. good grief.
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 9/10/12 at 3:12 pm to
LRHogFan....you're right about needing to win with good players before you can get great players, and it could be true that he would have built solid, sustainable programs had he stayed more than 4-5 years. But the evidence suggests that he just wasn't that interested in the defensive side if the ball.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter