Started By
Message
re: So 2 A&M Players That Were Supposed To Be Suspended For Their First Game
Posted on 8/29/12 at 3:17 pm to Bose Ikard
Posted on 8/29/12 at 3:17 pm to Bose Ikard
quote:
What doesn't make sense about, "these players are suspended for the La Tech game?"
They were initially suspended for the opener. What kind of punishment is it really if you're playing the "suspended when it's convenient" game?
quote:
It was internal punishment for an internal problem. Coach should give them whatever he thinks is appropriate.
And still doesn't make sense.
Posted on 8/29/12 at 3:30 pm to BluegrassBelle
They were initially suspended for A GAME. THE GAME PICKED HAPPENED TO BE the opener against La-Tech. That game was moved so he picked a different game date
Maybe he didn't want them to have a harsher punishment than being suspended from an OOC game.
quote:
What kind of punishment is it really if you're playing the "suspended when it's convenient" game?
Maybe he didn't want them to have a harsher punishment than being suspended from an OOC game.
This post was edited on 8/29/12 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 8/29/12 at 4:05 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
They were initially suspended for the opener. What kind of punishment is it really if you're playing the "suspended when it's convenient" game?
If we were doing that, they would be suspended for the Ole Mass game
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News