Started By
Message

re: So 2 A&M Players That Were Supposed To Be Suspended For Their First Game

Posted on 8/29/12 at 3:17 pm to
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99241 posts
Posted on 8/29/12 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

What doesn't make sense about, "these players are suspended for the La Tech game?"


They were initially suspended for the opener. What kind of punishment is it really if you're playing the "suspended when it's convenient" game?

quote:

It was internal punishment for an internal problem. Coach should give them whatever he thinks is appropriate.


And still doesn't make sense.
Posted by joe.liberst
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2012
1002 posts
Posted on 8/29/12 at 3:30 pm to
They were initially suspended for A GAME. THE GAME PICKED HAPPENED TO BE the opener against La-Tech. That game was moved so he picked a different game date
quote:


What kind of punishment is it really if you're playing the "suspended when it's convenient" game?

Maybe he didn't want them to have a harsher punishment than being suspended from an OOC game.
This post was edited on 8/29/12 at 3:32 pm
Posted by RoscoeHarper
Edmond, OK
Member since Aug 2011
4539 posts
Posted on 8/29/12 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

They were initially suspended for the opener. What kind of punishment is it really if you're playing the "suspended when it's convenient" game?


If we were doing that, they would be suspended for the Ole Mass game
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter