Started By
Message
re: Can Mark Emmert be objective:
Posted on 8/19/12 at 5:54 pm to Warfarer
Posted on 8/19/12 at 5:54 pm to Warfarer
quote:
They didn't want to go through the USCw shite again and they couldn't keep Auburn out of the championship game at that point.
Actually by doing what they should of done- declaring Newton ineligible the moment his father admitted he shopped him around- they most certainly could have. Did they want to from a money perspective- no way. Somewhere in the background Morricone's "The Ecstasy of Gold" is playing....
1
Posted on 8/19/12 at 6:11 pm to SoGaFan
Describe "shopped around" and show a link that proves Cecil shopped Cam around.
Talking money with one school doesn't constitute shopping around.
The NCAA already said they based this investigation on proof and not internet gossip, and MSU was the only school who admitted to talking money with Cecil.
I'm sure you want one of your players to be ruled ineligible simply on the basis of your rivals hoping he did something wrong.
Talking money with one school doesn't constitute shopping around.
The NCAA already said they based this investigation on proof and not internet gossip, and MSU was the only school who admitted to talking money with Cecil.
I'm sure you want one of your players to be ruled ineligible simply on the basis of your rivals hoping he did something wrong.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News